Replying to a comment on Middaugh's Money
It would be really outrageous to reduce Jim's clean money funding.
For one, Jim chose the clean money route based on the $200,000 figure. To cut that to $60,000 would be blatantly unfair.
More importantly, the suggestion that a one month shorter period means the campaign should cost significantly less is somewhere between stupid and naive. Basic campaign management says 80% of your money should go into voter contact in the last 5 weeks. So a 5 month versus a 4 month election is really irrelevant.
Reply
We use Markdown to style our comments. **This is bolded.** *This is italic.* [This is a link](url)
For more options,
try reading the
wikipedia article or the
official style guide.
Feeds


