Replying to a comment on Clandestine Wikipedia Edits from Novick Campaign? Ethics Problems Anyone?
petrichor's comment is really beside the point. It doesn't matter if Merkley's page was a complete and total campaign pamphlet prior to the changes. It's just not cool and shows a terrible lack of good judgement to edit the page of your opponent.
I don't get why Novick supporters keep making excuses for the bad behavior of his workers.
Reply
We use Markdown to style our comments. **This is bolded.** *This is italic.* [This is a link](url)
For more options,
try reading the
wikipedia article or the
official style guide.
Feeds


