FeedsReplying to a comment on National PDA Newsletter Misrepresents Local Chapter Meeting; Obfuscation of Endorsement Problems Continues.
Where does this:
"they don't see a problem with Kimmerly's dual role." get said by the PDA?
Even if you are right, by your logic Cheney's secret energy meetings and his conflict of interest with Haliburton were ok because the energy companies and Haliburton didn't object. (not to say that the PDA resembles any of those people but just an extension of the logic). Concealing a conflict of interest is wrong.
Furthermore, your attempt to brush this embarrassing moment for the Novick Campaign under the rug fails to take into account that Kimmerly violated the rules by issuing the notice for an endorsement interview less than thirty days in advance as the bylaws stipulate. Only when outed by a reporter at the Eugene Register Guard (hardly a rival campaign) were the bylaws enforced.
Reply
We use Markdown to style our comments. **This is bolded.** *This is italic.* [This is a link](url)
For more options,
try reading the
wikipedia article or the
official style guide.
