Replying to a comment on National PDA Newsletter Misrepresents Local Chapter Meeting; Obfuscation of Endorsement Problems Continues.
Even if she didn't write it, wouldn't the national organization rely heavily on reports from the state coordinator to send out such an email?
After all, this message goes into detail about what the author purports to have happened at Saturday's meeting. And that doesn't sync with Ben's memory of the event. Since Ben is young, I am loathe to cast doubts on his ability to recall events.
I would imagine that if Kimmerly did write this, or reported the happenings of the meeting to the national organization, she would want to reflect well on her work organizing the local chapter.
Problem is, it seems that this message omits key facts such as Kimmerly's day job as one of the Senate candidates' staffers. And when that's not disclosed, it creates the doubt that she's acting impartially and makes it impossible to know the veracity of her claims in this message.
Reply
We use Markdown to style our comments. **This is bolded.** *This is italic.* [This is a link](url)
For more options,
try reading the
wikipedia article or the
official style guide.
Feeds


