Replying to a comment on Check-Up: Measure 49
Be careful if you want to throw around the word "vested" (as in "vested interest in the decisions") within a football field of the topic of measure 37/49. That's where all the "murky" stuff comes in; we passed a statewide law that is left, to some extent, to each county to define through praxis and the civil courts (we have court cases under measure 49, just as we did under measure 37... and we still have apple pie and kittens). Actions that could have you (the land owner) vested in one county don't have you vested in another. This points to one strength of the design of our land use planning system: it is not a one size fits all- approach.
I have huge love for measure 49, I just wanted to point out the murky side suggested by Ralph.
Reply
We use Markdown to style our comments. **This is bolded.** *This is italic.* [This is a link](url)
For more options,
try reading the
wikipedia article or the
official style guide.
Feeds


