Witigonen

Feeds Feeds

Portland City Council #1 Candidates talk about the bureaus

Posted by Michael on January 15, 2008 at 7:08 a.m. in Portland, Politics

With Sam Adams running for mayor, that leaves an open seat on the Portland City Council. Not surprisingly, there are a lot of great candidates running for it. Since we have no idea who to support, we figured we would start out by simply asking the candidates questions that concern us. Rather than send out a large questionnaire, we're going to give the candidates time to reflect on the issues and provide us, and you, with a well thought out response. We have posted their responses below, unedited and in alphabetical order. See the first post in this series, which was about the support between the candidates for the commission style of government.

If you have a question that you think would be good for the candidates, drop us a line.

The question: Which Portland bureaus are doing the worst job? Why, and what would you do to fix them? Which ones are doing the best job?
Jeff BissonnetteBy and large, Portland's bureaus, which deliver the wide range of services Portlanders expect from their city, are operating well. According to the most recent Service Efforts and Accomplishments (SEA) report, Portlanders are generally satisfied with the direction and operation of the city.

However, there are areas for improvement. High on my radar is the Portland Development Commission. In May 2007, Portland voters gave more audit of the Portland Development Commission to the City Auditor and PDC budget oversight to the City Council. I think that both of these actions were warranted and I supported the measure that authorized these changes. I want the City Council to utilize the new budgetary oversight to ensure that the PDC's actions are aligned with the City's overall goals. There is a lot of work that needs to be done for the agency to be viewed as a helpful source of assistance in economic development and job creation.

In particular, the SEA report highlighted that only 39% of businesses viewed the City as providing quality economic development services. Even worse, 25% of businesses viewed the City's efforts to provide information on business opportunities as good or very good. And still worse, only 18% of businesses rated the City's efforts to provide information on financial assistance for business development as good or very good. All of these activities lie squarely within the jurisdiction of the PDC and should be at the heart of its activities.

The City Council, with its new budgetary oversight authority, is in a position to improve the PDC's ratings in these basic yet vital areas and I will seek to be a leader on the council in the continued reform of the PDC. In addition, I plan on creating an active, ongoing working group made up of the Small Business Advisory Council, other individual business owners, labor representatives and others to identify ways the City can be a partner to existing businesses, support new business start-ups in Portland and encourage business relocations to Portland.

In terms of bureaus that are doing a good job, I would highlight the Bureau of Emergency Communications and Portland Fire and Rescue as consistently delivering very high quality service in the core area of public safety.

John BranamPerhaps this sounds like a politician’s answer, but, quite frankly, I don’t look at the bureaus in terms of best or worst. I see challenges and opportunities to improve.

A primary thrust of my campaign - and, for that matter, my past professional experiences - has been strong leadership. No matter which bureaus I'm assigned I look forward to providing leadership that is both visionary and collaborative, and that looks to make improvements where there are shortcomings or oversights.

Although it is doubtful as a new council member that I would oversee the police bureau, I would like to make some improvements in public safety, and therefore plan to introduce several initiatives towards that goal.

By and large, the police bureau does a great job every day protecting and supporting Portlanders. These are, of course, important accomplishments because they directly contribute to Portland’s livability. That said, the police bureau has two primary challenges: One is a need for more effective use of resources; and, two, is a need for strengthen its relationships with communities and neighbors. For this questionnaire, I will address the second of those challenges - and what I would do to address it.

I believe that to better police a neighborhood, individual officers need to have strong connections to those communities. One way to accomplish this is to set in place a work plan whereby each officer is expected to spend four hours each month working, “on the ground” with a community organization. This would offer neighbors a great way for community members to know their officers better while also offering officers an opportunity to better understand the specific issues challenging a neighborhoods. Further, it would assist our officers in developing a more positive relationship with folk which I believe will pay off significantly, in terms of reducing crime and increasing the degree to which Portlanders feel positively towards our police, over time. (Moreover, I will set an example for this initiative by encouraging my staff members to each to spend four hours per month working with a community organization.)

A second measure to better integrate the police bureau with the neighborhoods they serve is to emphasize recruitment efforts on young men and women from Portland. Over the past several years there have highly publicized recruitment efforts from places as far away as Hawaii. If an officer is serving his or her neighborhood, not only will he or she have a stronger emotional connection, but also better understand the ins and outs of the community.

Additionally, I also will push to increase the number and training for response team officers working with neighborhoods. When elected, I will introduce an ordinance that would require city council to review assignments for any officer who has been a named defendant for more than two brutality lawsuits. Further, I will encourage adapting rules that permit full subpoena powers for the citizen’s police review committee.

Over the past year, under Chief Rosie Sizer, I believe the police bureau has addressed several concerns regarding use of force. As a councilmember, I hope to push these improvements further, and will work to substantively strengthen community policing so that the police bureau can address public safety at its roots.

For “best” bureau, again, I do not consider the city agencies in that regard. If I had the opportunity to choose one bureau, though, I would be most excited to work with the Office of Sustainable Development. Portland has a unique opportunity to demonstrate extraordinary leadership in rolling back our impact on the planet, and the Office of Sustainable Development can play a key role in our doing so. I would like to push and lead this important agenda.

Among the many ideas I have to preserve and improve Portland's quality of life, below are a few that relate specifically to this bureau:

The number one contributor to greenhouse gases is vehicle emissions, especially those coming from combustible engines. To address this serious issue Portland should increase its efforts to acquire a full fleet of low/no-impact vehicles. An exciting and relevant opportunity would be to partner with Honda to become the second region to pilot their newly released zero-emission, hydrogen fuel cell vehicle.

Further, the City of Portland must redouble its efforts to move towards purchasing only renewable energy - such as wind energy - to power its infrastructure.

The second major contributor to environmental degradation is construction. Without question I am excited about Portland's growth and its commitment to being a global leader in green building. Critical, then, is our ability to pioneer building practices that compliment Portland's vision for having green structures, and for building those structures utilizing innovative, green techniques.

While not considered by many to be an environmental issue, public housing is a key driver of suburban sprawl, whereby individuals and families move outside city centers (often seeking less expensive housing) and commute to their jobs still inside the city center (and, hence, creating more emissions). Suburban sprawl does unimaginable harm to the environment each year, and preventing it should be a top concern. As Portland continues to grow and experience economic success, we need to ensure Portlanders of all income levels can live inside the city - where they can bike and take mass transit to accomplish their daily needs.

In addition to these ideas I look forward to spending the first several months in office listening to the experts - bureau employees and passionate Portlanders - about their ideas for the Office of Sustainable Development and how we can, together, be more aggressive about preserving our beautiful natural surroundings and our amazing natural resources.

Many thanks for the opportunity to share my ideas. For more information about my platform or to join my campaign for city council please visit my website at www.John4PDX.org.


Amanda FritzAll bureaus do some things well, all have room for improvement. Bureau performance is a reflection of the skills and direction of the Commissioner in charge. I see no value in insulting the work of the current Councilmen. I will work collaboratively with the other four members of the City Council to ensure that every bureau is managed responsibly and professionally.

Over the past 20 years of working with the City in my role as a community leader, I have been continually impressed that the City of Portland is staffed with so many talented, dedicated, and experienced people. Most performance deficiencies are created by rigid institutional structures, lack of funding for core services, unclear policy direction by the Council, and invasive corporate influence. For example, antiquated and inflexible recruitment polices within the Portland Police Bureau prevent many community minded applicants from becoming peace officers, resulting in problems caused by understaffing. Budget constraints for the Office of Neighborhood Involvement severely limit its ability to support participation by a broad range of communities. Selecting MetroFi over supporting existing local city wireless initiatives such as Personal Teleco ignored both neighborhood input and existing competing community resources, and has not worked out well. I will fix outdated regulations, prioritize the budget, and listen to all citizens and staff.

Each bureau is led by a Director who reports to the Commissioner assigned to be in charge of that bureau. Bureau Directors manage staff and are responsible for performance. If, after review, the level of service is found to be deficient despite adequate funding, clear policies, and consistent support from the Council, I will find better managers for my bureaus.

As your City Commissioner, I will increase transparency in how decisions are made, support professional staff and community volunteers who do good work, and reduce waste resulting from lack of coordination between bureaus. I will not vote for major projects that take funds away from bureaus already unable to provide basic services to all city residents. I will encourage the City Council to implement policy and practice expectations consistently across bureaus, so all staff are given the direction, resources, and support needed to provide excellent service to every Portlander.
Charles LewisFrankly, I don't think any of the bureaus are doing a bad job -- I think any
problems we have rise directly from the council's lack of focus on serving everyday people and everyday problems. For example, it is absolutely ridiculous that Portland has 3,000 people living on the streets every night, yet our city government is channeling millions of dollars to a luxury hotel downtown. Pet projects like this new hotel and the Tram are great, but they do absolutely nothing to serve Portland's middle income and low-income people and families.

We've got a real opportunity to change the future of Portland politics in this election by electing someone with a demonstrated track record of both
fiscal and social responsibility. Through my work with Ethos Music Center, I've demonstrated what a rag tag group of social entrepreneurs can do to solve a pressing social justice issue -- that of equality in education for all of Portland's youth.

In terms of which bureaus are doing fine, I would say that the Fire Bureau and Water Bureau have made considerable strides. Personally, I would like
to focus specifically on the Bureau of Housing and Community Development to help Portland's struggling families and individuals better afford to live in our fair city.

For more information about my candidacy (including a number of video responses to candidate questions), please see our web site at
www.CharlesLewis.com
. Thanks!

Chris SmithI don't think it would be fair for me to single out "worst bureaus" because:
  1. I make no claim to have observed the operations of every single bureau; and
  2. I know there are hardworking and conscientious employees in every bureau and it would be unfair to pick on some

Having said that, if elected, I would want push every bureau I was responsible for (and I hope all the bureaus, with the cooperation of my
Council colleagues) to:

  • Have programs of continuous improvement, to deliver better service at better value to the taxpayer;
  • Be part of making the whole City more sustainable; and
  • Be more transparent in decision making and more open to citizen participation.


Spread the word

Facebook Share

Comments

Comments from site editors have a darker background than comments from everybody else.
  • Ms Fritz is incorrect in attributing the deficiencies of the Office of Neighborhood Involvement to budget constraints. This euphemistically named bureau has poorly defined responsibilities and a distant relationship with competence; it is an unfortunate legacy of the Katz era. Although it falls within the mayor's portfolio, Mr Potter long ago abandoned oversight. Last year's budget included hefty increases based largely upon the argument that the bureau had not received increases in prior years. Lobbying for last year's largesse was conducted by staff from organizations allegedly overseen by the bureau itself. Southeast Uplift, for example. ONI is a disaster for the city's residents. The City Council has remained unwilling to examine and remake a bureau that primarily serves itself.

    Posted by: Gardiner Menefree on January 15, 2008 at 11:20 a.m.
    • ONI is hailed as one of the main reasons that Portland has seen increased activism and participation while the rest of the country has slumped into apathy - see Better Together by Putnam and Feldstein.

      Posted by Michael on January 15, 2008 at 11:28 a.m.
  • Did we get fewer responses to this one than the last?

    Posted by Dan on January 16, 2008 at 6:53 p.m.

We use Markdown to style our comments. **This is bolded.** *This is italic.* [This is a link](url)
For more options, try reading the wikipedia article or the official style guide.